The Use of GM Crops in Developing Countries
Possible risks
1.9 Some commentators take the view that possible risks of GM crops for human health have not yet been sufficiently examined. In a common, but controversial, interpretation of what is known as the precautionary principle, critics argue that GM crops should not be used anywhere unless there is a guarantee that no risk will arise (for a discussion of this approach see paragraphs 4.35-4.42).11
1.10 There is also concern about the impact of GM crops on the environment. Critics point to the risk of potentially irreversible effects on biodiversity, which can be understood as the variety of plants, animals and other organisms that exists in nature. Genetic material from GM crops could be transferred to other plants and organisms, which might lead to unpredictable transformations. Critics therefore argue that unless there is certainty about the absence of such risks, neither field trials, nor commercial planting should take place. The centres of diversity of modern crops such as cotton or maize are primarily in developing countries. There are those who fear that cultivated crops and their wild relatives, which still grow in these regions, might be irreversibly altered by the transfer of genetic material from GM crops.12
1.11 There are also concerns about how and by whom GM crops are developed and marketed. The substantial benefits which accrued in developing countries from the Green Revolution (see Box 1.3) were largely the result of research undertaken in the public sector. But most research on GM crops is being undertaken by a relatively small number of private companies, although there is also significant work in the public sector. Many of those who object to the use of GM crops fear that research will be directed primarily towards the demands of commercial users in developed countries.13 It could be that only large-scale industrial farmers and the agro-chemical industry will benefit, while the needs of smallscale, resource-poor farmers in developing countries will be neglected.
| The Green Revolution is the popular term for the development and spread of high-yielding staple foods in developing countries. It began with maize hybrids in the 1950s. However, the main component was the introduction of semi-dwarf wheat and rice varieties, mainly to parts of Asia and Central America with well-functioning systems of irrigation, between 1962 and 1985.* The Green Revolution was brought about almost exclusively through research undertaken by institutions in the public sector. Apart from systematically spreading crop varieties that would flourish in a wide range of environments, it also involved increased use of fertilisers, pesticides and mechanised agriculture. |
| (*) Lipton M and Longhurst R (1989) New Seeds and Poor People (London: Routledge). |
1.12 Doubts have also been expressed about the technical and financial capacity of some developing countries to develop and apply regulation to ensure the safe use of GM crops.14 Some take the view that encouraging developing countries to adopt GM crops demonstrates a lack of sensitivity to their vulnerable position. Many of these countries have an urgent need to address issues of food security and may be tempted to adopt in haste a technology that could pose severe risks.15 Furthermore, there is concern that a focus on GMrelated applications may detract from efforts to explore other ways of enhancing agriculture, such as fostering more relevant national and international policies, improving systems of seed production and distribution, and promoting better development of markets and improved agricultural practices.16 We consider these and other arguments in the chapters that follow.
Footnotes11 British Medical Association (1999) The Impact of Genetic Modification on Agriculture, Food and Health: An Interim Statement (London: BMA); Oxfam (1999) Genetically Modified Crops, World Trade and Food Security (Oxford: Oxfam).
12 Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Electronic Forum on Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture (2002) Background Document to Conference 7, 31 May – 6 July 2002 Gene flow from GM to non-GM populations in the crop, forestry, animal and fishery sectors (FAO UN). Available: http://www.fao.org/biotech/C7doc.htm. Accessed on: 10 Oct 2003.
13 Action Aid (2003) GM Crops - Going Against the Grain (London: Action Aid); Five Year Freeze (2002) Feeding or Fooling the World? (London: Five Year Freeze).
14 See, for example, the discussion in the Archives of Debate of Conference 9 of the FAO Electronic Forum on Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture 28 April – 25 May 2003, Regulating GMOs in developing and transition countries. Available: http://www.fao.org/biotech/logs/c9logs.htm. Accessed on: 10 Oct 2003.
15 Independent Science Panel (2003) The Case for a GM-Free Sustainable World (London: ISP).
16 Action Aid (2003) GM Crops – Going Against the Grain (London: Action Aid); Food Ethics Council (2003) Engineering Nutrition: GM crops for global justice? (Brighton: Food Ethics Council); Oxfam (1999) Genetically Modified Crops, World Trade and Food Security (Oxford: Oxfam).